Skip to content
Companies & Studios

Marshall Cavendish

Part-work publishers

British publisher whose part-work magazines including Input taught computing to a generation through weekly collectible issues.

publisherbritishpart-workeducational 1968–present

Overview

Marshall Cavendish was a British publisher that specialised in part-works - magazines sold weekly that built into comprehensive reference collections. In the 1980s, they published several computing part-works including Input, which became the definitive computing education series.

While not a computing company per se, Marshall Cavendish’s publishing model brought programming education to newsagent shelves across Britain, making it accessible to anyone willing to spend £1 a week.

Fast Facts

  • Founded: 1968 (London)
  • Specialty: Part-work magazines
  • Computing titles: Input, Computer Tutor, others
  • Distribution: Newsagents nationwide
  • Model: Weekly collectible issues

Computing Part-Works

Marshall Cavendish published several computing titles:

  • Input (1984-1986) - 52-issue computing course
  • Computer Tutor - Interactive learning with tapes
  • How to Program Your… - Platform-specific series
  • Various other educational computing titles

The Part-Work Model

Part-works had unique characteristics:

  • Affordable - £1-2 weekly vs. £20 book upfront
  • Progressive - Built skills over months
  • Collectible - Complete sets with binders
  • Widely available - Every newsagent
  • Visual - High production values

Why It Worked for Computing

The part-work model suited computing education:

  • Matched progressive learning
  • Weekly programs to type in
  • Reference material accumulated
  • Affordable access to knowledge
  • No library or shop visit needed

Beyond Computing

Marshall Cavendish published part-works on:

  • Cooking and recipes
  • History and culture
  • Music and entertainment
  • Crafts and hobbies
  • Science and nature

The computing titles were part of a broader publishing strategy.

Legacy

Marshall Cavendish demonstrated:

  • Educational content could be mass-market
  • Progressive learning suited the format
  • Accessibility mattered (newsagent distribution)
  • Collection incentives drove completion

See Also